[問題] 像硬5000這樣有趣的諧音
前陣子上班不專心偷看PTT
看到板上推文裡有硬5000(應無騫)
不小心笑出來趕快咳嗽假裝喝水嗆到
所以好奇有哪些像硬5000這種好笑的諧音
只想得到一夜輸
+3、T53這些是沒笑點
大餅、噁心這種非原名諧音的不算
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 100.32.119.18
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Palmar_Drama/M.1460741015.A.32C.html
推
04/16 01:25, , 1F
04/16 01:25, 1F
噓
04/16 01:27, , 2F
04/16 01:27, 2F
→
04/16 01:28, , 3F
04/16 01:28, 3F
→
04/16 01:28, , 4F
04/16 01:28, 4F
→
04/16 01:29, , 5F
04/16 01:29, 5F
→
04/16 01:30, , 6F
04/16 01:30, 6F
※ 編輯: phantom78626 (100.32.119.18), 04/16/2016 01:34:50
※ 編輯: phantom78626 (100.32.119.18), 04/16/2016 01:35:20
→
04/16 01:36, , 7F
04/16 01:36, 7F
→
04/16 01:37, , 8F
04/16 01:37, 8F
→
04/16 01:37, , 9F
04/16 01:37, 9F
推
04/16 01:38, , 10F
04/16 01:38, 10F
5141跟+3 T53這些一樣沒笑點
→
04/16 01:38, , 11F
04/16 01:38, 11F
→
04/16 01:39, , 12F
04/16 01:39, 12F
→
04/16 01:39, , 13F
04/16 01:39, 13F
※ 編輯: phantom78626 (100.32.119.18), 04/16/2016 01:40:27
→
04/16 01:40, , 14F
04/16 01:40, 14F
→
04/16 01:41, , 15F
04/16 01:41, 15F
→
04/16 01:41, , 16F
04/16 01:41, 16F
→
04/16 01:42, , 17F
04/16 01:42, 17F
→
04/16 01:42, , 18F
04/16 01:42, 18F
個人覺得這條版規的用意是因為有人討論劇情用這種因替文
導致閱讀起來很多人不知道是啥
推文本非原文的一部分不至於影響原文之閱讀
而我發這篇要問的就是版友們創造的音替文
版友們創造的東西我不能在這裡問的話
那豈不是毫無道理
那真的怕音替文怕成這樣
版規是否應該乾脆改成一律不准出現音替文
規定是死的人是活的
要理解規定何來又為何有此規定
而不是不思考就覺得違反就噓搞得像白色恐怖
※ 編輯: phantom78626 (100.32.119.18), 04/16/2016 01:54:00
→
04/16 01:54, , 19F
04/16 01:54, 19F
→
04/16 01:55, , 20F
04/16 01:55, 20F
→
04/16 01:55, , 21F
04/16 01:55, 21F
→
04/16 01:56, , 22F
04/16 01:56, 22F
→
04/16 01:56, , 23F
04/16 01:56, 23F
→
04/16 01:58, , 24F
04/16 01:58, 24F
→
04/16 01:59, , 25F
04/16 01:59, 25F
所以兩位還是沒搞懂我的點
不是說這規定失效
而是我這篇不是討論劇情的文章啊所以音替文造成的負面不會在這裡
純粹只是要問有哪幾個好笑的音替文
就算推文很多又怎樣有造成影響原文的閱讀窒礙難行嗎
就代表大家就不顧版規會在所有文章都用音替文?
就像法律禁止殺人
但這規定不會禁止大家討論兇殺案啊
所以我問了兇殺案的問題我就會被視同殺人??
然後討論的人也會去殺人??
不懂這神邏
推
04/16 02:17, , 26F
04/16 02:17, 26F
像你這種與內文無關硬要打火星文的才叫違反版規吧
※ 編輯: phantom78626 (100.32.119.18), 04/16/2016 02:19:49
→
04/16 02:19, , 27F
04/16 02:19, 27F
→
04/16 02:19, , 28F
04/16 02:19, 28F
→
04/16 02:19, , 29F
04/16 02:19, 29F
我知道你們的點啊
推文出現音替文是違反但也不能一概適用啊
所以我前面就有表達了一項規定有解釋的空間
身為版主也不能無理啊
法院判決也是會講情理法會根據個案對法規做解釋
今天最好的做法就是直接改版規
如果是規定"一律不准出現"那我沒意見也會刪文
既然版主允許像硬5000這樣的詞出現
那就沒道理不讓我問不然就是標準不一
※ 編輯: phantom78626 (100.32.119.18), 04/16/2016 02:24:13
→
04/16 02:20, , 30F
04/16 02:20, 30F
→
04/16 02:21, , 31F
04/16 02:21, 31F
→
04/16 02:22, , 32F
04/16 02:22, 32F
還有 26 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
04/16 08:36, , 59F
04/16 08:36, 59F
噓
04/16 09:14, , 60F
04/16 09:14, 60F
推
04/16 09:33, , 61F
04/16 09:33, 61F
推
04/16 10:02, , 62F
04/16 10:02, 62F
→
04/16 10:04, , 63F
04/16 10:04, 63F
→
04/16 10:29, , 64F
04/16 10:29, 64F
→
04/16 18:47, , 65F
04/16 18:47, 65F
→
04/16 18:49, , 66F
04/16 18:49, 66F
推
04/16 19:19, , 67F
04/16 19:19, 67F
推
04/16 21:14, , 68F
04/16 21:14, 68F
→
04/16 21:15, , 69F
04/16 21:15, 69F
→
04/16 21:15, , 70F
04/16 21:15, 70F
推
04/16 21:29, , 71F
04/16 21:29, 71F
→
04/16 21:39, , 72F
04/16 21:39, 72F
→
04/16 21:40, , 73F
04/16 21:40, 73F
→
04/17 00:06, , 74F
04/17 00:06, 74F
→
04/17 00:17, , 75F
04/17 00:17, 75F
→
04/17 00:19, , 76F
04/17 00:19, 76F
→
04/17 00:20, , 77F
04/17 00:20, 77F
→
04/17 00:20, , 78F
04/17 00:20, 78F
→
04/17 00:21, , 79F
04/17 00:21, 79F
→
04/17 00:21, , 80F
04/17 00:21, 80F
→
04/17 00:21, , 81F
04/17 00:21, 81F
→
04/17 00:22, , 82F
04/17 00:22, 82F
→
04/17 00:22, , 83F
04/17 00:22, 83F
→
04/17 00:23, , 84F
04/17 00:23, 84F
推
04/17 01:25, , 85F
04/17 01:25, 85F
→
04/17 01:26, , 86F
04/17 01:26, 86F
推
04/17 13:03, , 87F
04/17 13:03, 87F
→
04/17 13:03, , 88F
04/17 13:03, 88F
→
04/17 13:03, , 89F
04/17 13:03, 89F
→
04/17 13:03, , 90F
04/17 13:03, 90F
→
04/17 13:05, , 91F
04/17 13:05, 91F
→
04/17 13:07, , 92F
04/17 13:07, 92F
推
04/17 17:32, , 93F
04/17 17:32, 93F
推
04/17 19:28, , 94F
04/17 19:28, 94F
→
04/17 19:29, , 95F
04/17 19:29, 95F
→
04/17 19:29, , 96F
04/17 19:29, 96F
→
04/17 19:30, , 97F
04/17 19:30, 97F
推
04/17 23:08, , 98F
04/17 23:08, 98F
Palmar_Drama 近期熱門文章
PTT影音娛樂區 即時熱門文章
-2
14