Re: Furt conducts Bruckner sym no.8
※ 引述《Piaf (...)》之銘言：
※ 引述《wenthome (檻外人)》之銘言：
推
推 211.21.59.114 02/22,
推 211.21.59.114 02/22
>CD冊子的確是標Nowak 但是這是錯誤的資訊 詳見以下網頁
>http://home.comcast.net/%7Ejberky/Furt_1954_B8.htm
>在Ben Korstvedt的Bruckner Sym. No.8這本書 這份錄音也標為1892年版
>我覺得上面兩個資料來源可信度很大
I just check the Furtwangler/VPO/1954 recording of
Bruckner Symphony no.8. Yes, it's 1892 version rather
than the Nowak version. An easy way to identify these
two versions is to check mm 93-98 in the Finale, which
is cut in the 1892 version (2'49" in Furt's recording).
Also, in m. 479 a cymbal clash is added (14'29") in
the 1892 version.
I guess in 1892 version, mm. 183 (so-called Caucasian
march) is marked mp or p (ff in Nowak) with a huge cresc.
Both Furt and Knap/1951/BPO did not directly adopt ff
in mm. 183. However I don't have the full score of 1892
version, so I cannot give you exact markings, but the
above evidence will be adequate to prove this recording
a 1892 version.
(The above examples are all from the Finale. All measure
numbers are according to the 1890 version by Nowak.)
--
Piaf @ PTT; klem/Dutchman elsewhere.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 141.212.126.245
※ 編輯: Piaf 來自: 141.212.126.245 (02/25 01:00)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇)：
clmusic 近期熱門文章
PTT影音娛樂區 即時熱門文章
