Re: 關於民粹

看板media-chaos (媒亂(媒體亂象))作者 (recta sequi)時間19年前 (2007/08/21 00:29), 編輯推噓3(3012)
留言15則, 3人參與, 最新討論串5/7 (看更多)
※ 引述《JohnnyZhu (旋轉吧!! 貓兒~)》之銘言: : 所以一個是具有強烈貶意的 另個 alternative term 沒有強烈的貶意 : 如此而已 : 這兩個 在翻譯上 都同樣翻譯成民粹 並沒有這回事 Popularism (italian: popolarismo) is a political doctrine conceived by Don Luigi Sturzo as a middle way between Socialism and Liberalism and opposed to Fascism because of its stress on Democracy. Populism is a political doctrine or philosophy that purports to defend the interests of the common people against an entrenched, self-serving or corrupt elite. There has often been dispute over definitions of populism, with some even arguing that the term is too vague to be useful. 要引用維基麻煩先看懂 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.117.8.244

08/21 00:31, , 1F
要不要我翻譯成中文?
08/21 00:31, 1F

08/21 00:32, , 2F
我每天至少要看十篇以上的生科原文
08/21 00:32, 2F

08/21 00:32, , 3F
需要你這種貨色來教我?
08/21 00:32, 3F

08/21 00:32, , 4F
撲哈哈哈你翻啊 不過你還可以順便比較
08/21 00:32, 4F

08/21 00:34, , 5F
( ︶︿︶)_╭∩╮我不該惹猴子生氣的
08/21 00:34, 5F

08/21 00:33, , 6F
生科耶 我好害怕喔 不過與你英文破何干?
08/21 00:33, 6F

08/21 00:35, , 7F
不要討論我英文破不破 你先看懂內文吧
08/21 00:35, 7F

08/21 00:35, , 8F
亂引用一段 就在那裡吱吱叫
08/21 00:35, 8F

08/21 00:35, , 9F
E大小心因為這種人而被水桶,不值
08/21 00:35, 9F

08/21 00:35, , 10F
很抱歉你犯版規了 再見 再見 再見~~~~
08/21 00:35, 10F

08/21 00:43, , 11F
對啊 我犯了指證你的錯誤?
08/21 00:43, 11F

08/21 00:44, , 12F
妳到底要不要看12040
08/21 00:44, 12F

08/21 00:44, , 13F
a more politically correct alternativ
08/21 00:44, 13F

08/21 00:44, , 14F
e term
08/21 00:44, 14F

08/21 00:45, , 15F
你看這句就好了吧 有沒有羞恥心啊?
08/21 00:45, 15F
文章代碼(AID): #16oS5uEx (media-chaos)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
1
1
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 7 篇):
2
3
19年前, 08/21
2
2
3
15
1
1
-2
5
11
24
6
13
19年前, 08/20
文章代碼(AID): #16oS5uEx (media-chaos)