Re: [問題] NCIS的法律問題
※ 引述《Dorothy (為什麼要有暱稱?)》之銘言：
: 2.關於大家常聽到的那句被逮捕前應該要說的話
: 我相信只是因為戲劇長度的關係被縮減
: 因為執法人員不可能沒有宣讀這段話就逕行逮捕
: 否則將會造成逮捕行為的違法
: 此段宣讀的文字在美國被稱為"The Miranda Warning"
看完第一篇的時候去查的東西 XD 來源為 wikipedia
Due to the prevalence of American television programs and motion pictures in
which the police characters frequently read suspects their rights, it has
become an expected element of arrest procedure. In the 2000 Dickerson decision
, Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote that Miranda warnings had
"become embedded in routine police practice to the point where the warnings
have become part of our national culture." Dickerson v. United States 530
U.S. 428 (2000). However, police are only required to warn an individual
whom they intend to subject to custodial interrogation at the police station,
in a police vehicle, or when detained. Arrests can occur without questioning
and without the Miranda warning—although if the police do change their mind
and decide to interrogate the suspect, the warning must then be given.
因為電視、電影上常常出現，基本上這句話大家都認為是逮捕這動作中必要的一環。
2000年 Dickerson判決中，大法官 William Rehnquist 寫下 Miranda warning "已經是
全國性的文化。"但事實上，警方只需要對他們打算審問/質問/偵訊的嫌犯告知這個權利，
不管是在警察局、警車、還是羈押的時候。警方可以在不質問、不告知
Miranda Rights的情況下逮捕嫌犯──但如果警方改變主意要質問的話，就必須要
告知嫌犯他的Miranda Rights。
所以...其實沒唸好像也可以？XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 74.131.22.252
推
09/22 07:11, , 1F
09/22 07:11, 1F
→
09/22 07:12, , 2F
09/22 07:12, 2F
→
09/22 07:13, , 3F
09/22 07:13, 3F
推
09/22 08:41, , 4F
09/22 08:41, 4F
→
09/22 08:42, , 5F
09/22 08:42, 5F
→
09/22 08:44, , 6F
09/22 08:44, 6F
→
09/22 08:44, , 7F
09/22 08:44, 7F
推
09/22 08:47, , 8F
09/22 08:47, 8F
→
09/22 08:48, , 9F
09/22 08:48, 9F
討論串 (同標題文章)
NCIS 近期熱門文章
PTT影音娛樂區 即時熱門文章
-13
30
32
138