Re: [自由時報]烏龍評論

看板media-chaos (媒亂(媒體亂象))作者 (Tin man with a heart)時間16年前 (2009/05/08 18:05), 編輯推噓7(702)
留言9則, 6人參與, 最新討論串8/10 (看更多)
※ 引述《manfale (經深綠認證的戰神)》之銘言: 43 : 中海所提出的收購價是每股67美元 但是新聞說 中海又不願意把收購價提高到70元 : 要是沒有人出價比較高 中海自己和自己競標 是嫌錢太多沒處花嗎? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 下推論前 請多看看外電原文報導 每股$70收購價 一直是"美國分析師"針對這場政治氣氛濃厚的競標戰爭給的"建議" 7/21/2005 華盛頓郵報 Unocal Accepts Chevron's Raised Bid $17 Billion Offer Still Lower Than Chinese Firm's http://0rz.tw/8XW67 顧問公司ISS認為在局勢一面倒的情況下 中海油得提高到每股$70的誘人價才可能有勝算 8/1/2005 ISS endorses Chevron's takeover bid for Unocal http://0rz.tw/gbslB 最後是因為有人出高價嗎? 請看看中海油宣佈退出的理由 8/2/2005 紐約時報 Chinese Company Ends Unocal Bid, Citing Political Hurdles http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/02/business/worldbusiness/02cnd-china.html But in the end, Cnooc officials said they were reluctant to increase their bid to close to $20 billion because Washington seemed unlikely to approve the deal and had even recently adopted legislation that would have slowed or mired the approval process. 8/2/2005 英國Guardian Chinese oil firm drops Unocal bid http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2005/aug/02/oil.money "CNOOC has given active consideration to further improving the terms of its offer, and would have done so but for the political environment in the US," the company said in a statement. --- 有啥爭議 ╮(﹀_﹀")╭ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.166.37.209

05/08 21:45, , 1F
他應該是要凹到讓人承認他是對的吧:P
05/08 21:45, 1F

05/08 22:50, , 2F
樓上華肯 XD
05/08 22:50, 2F

05/08 22:51, , 3F
什麼時候才有不用講解半天的自由自婊
05/08 22:51, 3F

05/08 22:56, , 4F
等自由墮落到和聯合中時一樣的時候吧
05/08 22:56, 4F

05/08 22:57, , 5F
05/08 22:57, 5F

05/08 23:08, , 6F
推三樓 請找簡明易懂的自婊好嗎?= =
05/08 23:08, 6F

05/08 23:09, , 7F
明明就看不懂還要被酸 真是倒楣
05/08 23:09, 7F

05/08 23:19, , 8F
希望政黑眾加油點 推出比美mattel大
05/08 23:19, 8F

05/08 23:20, , 9F
大的比較文
05/08 23:20, 9F
文章代碼(AID): #1A10F_da (media-chaos)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1A10F_da (media-chaos)